Three obvious mistakes to avoid when dealing with Research and Development Tax Relief claims

There's nothing like a true story to justify why, as an expert, you add value to a company's Research and Development Tax Relief Claim.

Friday, 5th January 2018, 6:00 am
Updated Friday, 8th June 2018, 12:14 am
Simon Bulteel, director at Cooden Tax Consulting

This is a case which we dealt with over the summer. The client had recently switched accountants, the new one referred them to Cooden Tax Consulting, but the old one had submitted a claim for R&D Tax Relief that didn’t have one element of accuracy in it.

It was only a small claim so they probably weren’t that bothered, but they are a large firm so I would expect a little more knowledge. The section of the letter they wrote to the client that covered the claim is below:

“A claim has been made for enhanced tax relief for research and development tax relief on the costs of the work subcontracted out to ABCDEF University. The uplift on cost for subcontracted work is only 30% compared to 125%. Furthermore, the government grant funding is netted off against the eligible expenditure.”

So, in my opinion here are the inaccuracies:

1 – A government grant linked to R&D does mean that some or potentially all of the claim for R&D Tax Relief would be under the old Large Scheme or RDEC, however in this case the grant was from UK Trade and Industry to help the company develop its export potential. Therefore, the company could claim under the SME scheme.

2 – The uplift for sub contracted R&D, where you pay someone else to assist with some technical elements of the R&D, is not limited to 30%, it can be included in a claim under the SME scheme for 125% uplift (now 130% uplift), however the company will only be able to claim 65% of the cost from the subcontractor.

3 – What I think they were driving at was if we are claiming under the large scheme for your grant funded project the uplift under the old Large Scheme is only 30%, however even if the government grant had been in support of the company’s R&D it does not need to be netted off the actual expenditure, the full cost should have been included in the claim.

If you’ve been working with an accountant for an R&D Tax Relief claim and you think they might have made similar errors in calculating your claim, you still have until the second anniversary of the end of the tax accounting period to amend the claim.

Why not contact us for a review of your historic claim, we might be able to make some significant improvements. Call Simon today on 01424 225345.