Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

The Last Straw

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 March 2009
I don't know whether you saw the news about Jack Straw last week?
The Justice Secretary made history. For the first time, he used the Government veto which is part and parcel of the Freedom of Information Act.

Going against the decision of the Information Tribunal, Mr Straw chose to block the publication of two sets of minutes from Cabinet Meetings leading up to the decision to go to war in Iraq.

He said that to publish the minutes would do 'serious damage to Cabinet government'.

I confess to having been (to use one of my granddad's favourite phrases) a bit vexed about this decision.

Mr Straw has now spent the last of the Perry family goodwill credits earned (unbeknown to himself) when (as President of the Student Union) he helped my dad find new digs at short notice in Leeds, in the late 1960s.

I mean really. The use of the veto stinks.

New Labour has shown itself to be the arch-protagonist of 'one rule for them, and another one for us' governance.

This tendency has shown itself in so many and varied arenas. Whether it's been the obfuscation on MPs expenses, the failure to restrain the City, the backing of the Bush foreign policy, or now the dodging of the Freedom of Information Act, it has added to the unpleasant odour of decay which surrounds the Labour Government...

I was so incensed by Mr Straw's actions that I wrote to our Labour MP and asked him what his own position was on the matter.

When I have questioned Michael previously about the Government's stance on ID Cards, on 42 day detention and the DNA database, his response has always been that if people have nothing to hide, they have nothing to fear.

From this perspective, surely it was unacceptable to him that the public would not be given access to information about one of the most controversial foreign policy decisions in the country's recent history?

He wrote back with a question: if Cabinet members knew their discussions could be published, he asked, how would you deal with the tendency for them to say nothing or simply hold private conversations beforehand?

My reply is that whilst it is understandable for politicians to have private conversations, the country should expect the Cabinet itself to be a democratic body, and that Cabinet ministers should be prepared to stand by what they believe.

That Cabinet members might choose to avoid making comments because of the Freedom of Information Act is one of the most concerning things I have heard for some time.

It's what we've come to, politically.

And the Tories are no better.

I have still to get a reply from my Conservative counterpart after asking her if she supports her party in backing the Government's veto.

Her silence speaks volumes.

I urge you to remember this at the ballot box: it was only Liberal Democrats who voted against the Iraq War, and it was only Liberal Democrats who voted against the use of the FOI veto.

(To read more about what Nick has been up to, check out his blog – 'Nick Perry for Hastings & Rye' at www.nickperrylibdem.wordpress.com]

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 04 March 2009 8:15 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hastings
 
Prev
1
Next
1

AldusHuxley,

Hastings 04/03/2009 09:11:58
An excellent article which makes many valid and pertinent points.

Straw’s actions are unacceptable in a democracy. We have a right to know the Cabinet discussions around the illegal Iraq war. Its still costing the taxpayers billions of pounds a year. Billions of pounds which could have been used for more fitting purposes ie. NHS. If the Labour Government Ministers are not prepared to govern in line with British Constitutional Practices they should resign.

There are of course many issues where our democracy is threatened ranging from ID cards to photographing policemen. Yet we are on course for billions to be wasted on ID cards …and it was only the other day a Government sponsored report stated that they are not viable. With this Government’s incompetence when it comes to computer information retention and their blatant opening of our records to all and sundry , our freedoms are in danger.

I am somewhat surprised that Amber Rudd has not replied to you re the Straw veto ,as two weeks ago she headed her article “ In praise of Liberty “ , making the point about losing our freedoms. As a parliamentary candidate she has a duty to let us know where she stands on this issue in view of her remarks on freedoms. I trust we will hear from her soon !

Michael Foster’s attitude is no surprise. Like many people, I have come to realise that it’s a complete waste of time writing to him. He always backs to Government’s views and, in my experience, he has shows no interest in his constituents’ views unless they are the same as his own.

As you rightly say ..his response to your comments show the depth to which politics has sunk. If our local MP does not wish to follow Constitutional practices and act in accordance with the views of his constituents …he should resign. Sooner rather than later !

Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.