Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Counters Sponsorship
Sponsored by
Making luxury bathrooms affordable.
Click here to visit our virtual showroom.
 
 
Friday, 22nd August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Government Post Office shambles is hurting Rye



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

I have been very sad to see the chaos that has arisen from the closure of the well-used and valued Post Office at Tilling Green.
When local Lib Dems canvassed opinion about the prospective closures at the end of last year, it was clear that everyone bar none was against the closure, and feared for the outcome if the main post office in Rye was the only option.

Reading the letters from local people week on week, it is clear that the Post Office network is letting Rye down.

In my column on the Observer website, I have, in the past, praised Michael Foster the Labour MP for the effort he has put in to try to keep the Tilling Green post office (and others in Hastings) open.

This effort has been to no avail, and has been cheapened by Michael's vote with the Government at Westminster, backing their incompetent handling of the Post Office situation. Needless to say, current Government policy hits our most vulnerable hardest, and more often than not, our rural communities comparatively harder than our urban communities (although there are aspects of regeneration to be considered for urban communities as well).

Over in Hastings, the Labour Party has come unstuck, 'misleading' people (in the words of Michael Foster) that they had managed to save the Old Town post office. We will have to wait until early Friday morning for the results of the Hastings Borough Council elections, to see whether or not Labour has been punished for this kind of brass neck.

But the Conservatives also must be careful. They have criticised Labour for the spin they have put on the whole post offices business, but are not so quick to admit that 3500 post offices were closed under the last Conservative Government.

David Cameron may be trying to stake his claim to new political territory as champions of the vulnerable and the excluded, but it does not wash.

The Conservatives would have you believe that they are the answer to the problems of 11 years of Labour.

It is my firm belief that they are not.

There is an alternative to both Labour and the Conservatives at the local elections and also at the General Election.

There is a party that is well-known for its determination to support the self-determination and self-sufficiency of local communities. A party that started to campaign against the closure of local post offices in 2006, long before the Conservatives even caught a whiff of the potential political capital to be had, given the Government's appalling handling of the issue.

That party is the Liberal Democrat Party. And it is my role as the parliamentary campaigner to try to persuade you that it is the Liberal Democrats who are the future for our constituency. When the Government is clearly failing to be 'on their side', and the calibre of the Conservatives is questionable, we Liberal Democrats must demonstrate that there is another political way.

Rest assured, I will be doing all I can to persuade you!

The full article contains 516 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 April 2008 4:56 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hastings
 
Prev
1
2
1

Fidel,

30/04/2008 11:24:15
Bit quiet around here... Hello has the exposed one shut up now.
2

,

30/04/2008 12:55:16
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
3

Darryl,

Hastings 30/04/2008 14:17:44
ELECTION EXPENSES
I am concerned recently to have receive a letter from Michael Foster on House of Commons paper (therefore from his MP’s expenses) , soliciting me to vote and attaching a postal vote form and a glossy contact sheet with our MP’s photograph.

Two things concern me. Firstly I don’t see why I should as a taxpayer be paying the political expenses of the Labour Party. I understood from MP’s rules , that MP’s expenses should not be used for election communications.

Secondly postal voters are liable to fraud , and this has been well documented by a parliamentary committee. Such correspondence is also a waste of money and paper. ( Hardly green Mr Foster ! )

Also of concern in Ads Weekly is the advertisement Michael Foster has placed bearing the House of Commons logo ..hence more MP’s expenditure. Similar arguments as above.

This is grossly unfair to the Lib/Dems and Conservatives as they don’t have recourse to MP’s expenses in this instance.

I trust that Nick and Amber are making the necessary complaints.
4

Fidel,

30/04/2008 14:26:52
Darryl /Maxine, fancy receiving a letter from a political party. I agree this is astonishing during an election period, and I should inform the police if I were you. Also an advert you say, what is the world coming to, I would dial 999 without delay. I suggest that you hand this, and any literature you receive from the tories and libdems over to special branch in order for them to investigate further. Thanks for bringing this to the attention of the world at large, you are our saviour.
5

Darryl,

Hastings 30/04/2008 14:30:34
Sorry ..you're speaking from ignorance of the electoral expenses rules with relation to MP's.
Suggest you read up !
6

Fidel,

30/04/2008 14:39:46
Oh no Darryl, you're asserting that the money comes from MP's expenses not donations or membership fees. I'm sure Nick and Amber are grateful for your concern, but are probably a bit more astute than you.
7

Googling,

30/04/2008 15:21:50
sorry darryl your wrong here

i got the same letter. it urges people to vote not to vote for any particular party. you received the letter - do u suddenly feel compelled to vote labour? i think not

it doubtless was payed for with public money but surely an MP has a duty to try and encourage people to vote - of all political persuasions. i would say that is money well spent

why do people begrudge all public expenditure? it is truly baffling. you expect MPs to represent a whole constituency without any resources - ridiculous.

amber and nick don't have the funds - your right there but then again they don't do any work do they?
8

MAXINE OUT,

30/04/2008 15:32:18
Darryl

You really do show your own ignorance of election expenses.

A report back or a communication from an MP as long as it is not party political or asking for support for a particular candidate or candidates party does not count towards any specific candidates return of election expenses - how could it?
9

Fidel,

30/04/2008 15:39:30
Darryl, guess your ignorance is shining through, still going to tell your friends Nick and Amber?

It might be a good idea to know your facts before making accusations, after all as you pointed out, we only want constructive debate on this site.
10

Darryl,

Hastings 30/04/2008 17:40:47
Coming so near an election ..with references to the like of twin bins ....to me its obviuosly meant as an elction communication. But then this government is underhand in everything ....so true to form !

I understand the Conservatives have made a complaint about the newspaper Ad... I think both Nick and Amber are capable of acting on theit own initiative.

Speaking of ignorance ,Fidel, you mentioned on Amber's page that private pensions were nothing to do with Labour. The private pensions brought in by Labour are called Stakeholder pensions and are administered by insurance companies to government guidelines. Suggest you dig a little deeper to find out what your party is doing !
Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.