Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Counters Sponsorship
Sponsored by
Making luxury bathrooms affordable.
Click here to visit our virtual showroom.
 
 
Friday, 22nd August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Radiographer suspended after patient collapsed



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
17 July 2008
A radiographer who asked a patient to sit upright for an x-ray despite having been advised not to do so because of the risk of collapse has been suspended for a year.
June Nottage, from St Leonards, who worked at the Conquest Hospital had also lied about when theatre tickets had been bought to obtain two days annual leave, the disciplinary Health Professions Council (HPC) panel was told.

Announcing the decision
to suspend Mrs Nottage, panel chairman John Williams said : "We are satisfied she demonstrated a serious shortfall in her patient care and professional standards and told lies."

As far as the x-ray was concerned Mr Williams said Mrs Nottage had been asked to carry one out on the patient on 1 December 2005 in the Accident and Emergency department and was "specifically requested by nursing staff not to move the patient to a sitting position.

He continued: "Mrs Nottage ignored that request and did move the patient to a sitting position for the purposes of an x-ray. Very shortly afterwards the patient experienced a collapse and nursing staff had to administer oxygen and fluids."

Turning to the lies about theatre tickets he said Mrs Nottage asked a colleague to support her in an "incorrect assertion" that she needed annual leave for 27 and 28 April, 2006, because she had theatre tickets for 27 April which had been bought in December 2005.

She told the colleague on 3 April, 2006, her husband had booked tickets to go to the theatre at the end of April.

While absent from work due to illness the next day Mrs Nottage phoned the colleague and asked her to check whether she would be able to have those two days for annual holiday and was told it was unlikely.

Mrs Nottage then asked the colleague to make her request for the time off to a senior official saying she could say the tickets were "booked in December, 2005."

A week later Mrs Nottage also claimed that the tickets had been booked back in December but the hearing was told that her colleague felt uncomfortable about this and told the general manager what was happening and an investigation ensued.

The hearing was told that Mrs Nottage resigned on 28 July five days before an internal disciplinary hearing and she was not present for the HPC hearing.



The full article contains 398 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 17 July 2008 2:42 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hastings
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Jonny Horst,

Burton St. Leonards 29/07/2008 22:07:35
I'm utterly confused as to what the annual leave issue has to do with anything! Perhaps it is just the poor use of prose in this article? Was the lady 'pulling a sickie' after the previously requested leave was denied? What difference did it make as to when the tickets were booked? I'm sure the HPC have their valid reasons for supsending this lady, but this article blurs all coherent context with trivialities about annual leave. Did anybody actually die, what was the problem?!? Shouldn't we stop 'bashing' the Health Care Professionals and all other members of our community who work at our local hospital; after all, no Conquest to complain about, no Observers to sell. "Hands off our Hospital" indeed!
2

Righty Rightwing,

Hastings 07/08/2008 09:19:36
What a poorly written article! Is the Observer using poorly-educated children who are on work experience to write articles now?

The first two lines give the impression that it is going to be an story that is in the public interest and worthwhile reading.

However, the remainder of the article is nothing short of an incoherent rambling about sickness, annual leave, and theatre tickets, apart from one paragraph which mentions the patient who collapsed.

How about a writing an article that is really in the public interest? May I suggest, perhaps, a story about how much NHS money is wasted on translation, or meeting unnecessary government targets?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.