Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Trade Counters Sponsorship
Sponsored by
Making luxury bathrooms affordable.
Click here to visit our virtual showroom.
 
 
Thursday, 21st August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Grove, Hillcrest and Filsham Valley all face the axe



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
30 June 2008
HASTINGS is reeling after yesterday's shock news that three secondary schools in the town are to shut.
Filsham Valley, The Grove and Hillcrest will shut in 2011 and be replaced by two academies, backed by a university, business and the local authority.

Its just a proposal at the moment but the county council will push the plan through.

They've had enough of these three schools underperfomring over a lengthy period.

The trio of underachieving schools was placed under the leadership of school improvement company Ninestiles Plus earlier this year in a bid to drive up performance in behaviour, attendance and attainment over the next three years.

The council has taken this new move because it is worried what would happen to the schools after the three years.

Brighton University is the main partner, along with BT, and the county council.

This is exciting news for Hastings - which already has a new college costing £93million opening next year.

Now a report from East Sussex County Council's director of children's services Matt Dunkley outlines a drastic move to close the schools at the end of this three-year period in 2011, and establish two academies in their place.

"It is important to emphasise that the two academies would be new schools and that all three existing schools would close: it is not a question of simply choosing one of the three to close," says his report, which is to be discussed at a Cabinet meeting next Tuesday (July 8).

"In addition, it is proposed that the local authority also acts as a co-sponsor," continued Mr Dunkley. "It is believed that this combination of a public, higher education sponsor combined with the business strengths of a major private sector company, combined with the educational expertise and democratic accountability of the local authority will offer powerful sponsorship for the proposed academies."

According to the council, staff at the schools could transfer to the new academies if they wished.

If the Cabinet approves Mr Dunkley's recommendation to further explore the academies plan, a detailed feasibility study will be carried out followed by public consultation next year.

The report concludes: "The recommendation is made because it provides the basis for considering a long-term strategy for sustainable improvement for the mixed sex schools in Hastings."

Less than 30 per cent of pupils at The Grove, Filsham Valley and Hillcrest currently achieve at least five good GCSEs, falling below Government minimum standards.

Three weeks ago, all three were included in a list of 638 failing schools in England by Education Secretary Ed Balls as he unveiled a £400 million National Challenge package.

The full article contains 445 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 July 2008 7:48 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hastings
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

Mugsborough Citizen,

30/06/2008 15:14:51
Wow. Can the Taxpayers of Hastings continue to allow the County Council to treat out Town with such contempt?

After failing to fund a decent standard of education for so many years, the children are to be failed, once again. Proper funding, decent management and the continuation of their sixth forms WOULD have boosted standards. The ounty Council have deliberately caused this istuation. Matt Dunkley is a failure as was Stokoe and her chums (and the idiots that employed them).

It looks like the end for Grove School which is sited on a decent peice of "building land" where the County can make a big profit. Perhaps this was their real agenda behind the Tory/New Labour destruction of our local schools.

2

bart simpson,

30/06/2008 21:54:53
At the meeting this afternoon, Matt Dunckley claimed that both Labour and the Tories, who have betrayed the teachers and students on this, are in favour of this scheme... or scam... Meanwhile, B.T who are also sponsors and property developers who will build on the Grove school, will also profit, out of this privatisation.
Nice little niche for them all, at the cost of the students and the tax payers.
3

Peanut73,

Hastings 01/07/2008 07:52:37
So what happens to our children? My daughter will just be beginning her GCSE year,yet again more uncertainty, just when the children least need it.
4

Darryl,

Hastings 01/07/2008 08:15:30

Full details , together with all the declared interests need to be put before the public , prior to any decisions being made. What exactly is BT's role ?
Are any other pertners to be considered other than BT ?
Is a proper tendering process in place for property companies ?

Exactly how are these changes going to affect the children of Hastings ? This scheme needs to demonstrate conclusively that educationally this is an improvement. For that we need to understand exactly what has gone wrong at the schools in question.

5

Mugsborough Citizen,

01/07/2008 11:09:25
The failure of these schools (and Thomas Peacocke in Rye) are a direct result of the County Council mis-management, funding cuts and their "Head-hunted" appointments of headteachers who were "not up to the job". Indeed the last head of Hillcrest was "let go" after only one term BUT he has closed the sixth form in that short time and the rot had, as a result, set in.

If Dexter Hutt were confident in his company's ability to improve these schools, this closure plan would be idiotic. We must assume that he is expecting to take the money and run whilst the schools and the pupils are left to fail. This is clear evidence that he and "Ninestiles" are a waste of money, as most teachers and parents already knew.

If the County Council were serious about improving standards in local scools, they would restore the financial cuts that they have made, dismiss their failing staff at County Hall(including Dunkley) and start to provide a safe environment and the tools for teachers to teach and for pupils to learn. The further disruption of closures and (untried) privately run (for profit) academies, will cause far more harm than good for our town and its people.
6

Felix the cat,

Hastings 01/07/2008 15:12:19
What a mess!

What a waste of tax payers money. What was the point of getting Sir Dexter in.

Brighton Uni will run things their way, not the Dexter Hutt way. Anything he does over the next 3 years will go out the window. How much has this fiasco already cost tax payers?

They have only just built Filsham valley, 14 years old and now they want to close it and set up an Academy. What a waste of tax payers money!

Filsham Valley shines with special needs pupils. Academies don't have to accept special needs kids. They are not required to abide by the same rules as state schools. The government released figures this week that shows temporary exclusions from Academies are more than double that of state run schools.

Yes, Academies can look good on paper, but it is unfair to compare the results of Academies with local authority run schools as they are free to pick and choose who they want to teach.

Academies are profit making businesses, nothing more. Pupil education will always come second to making a profit and large pay packets for the big wigs.

This can only be seen as a massive cover up. Matt Dunkley obviously made a big mistake bringing in Dexter Hutt's gang. He has spent millions on the ninestiles Plus contract and now he sees that it is not going to work long term, he is trying to cover it up with an even bigger more expensive scheme. A scheme that will allow him to wash his hands of the entire education problems in Hastings.

I feel so sorry for the kids of our town. What future do they have when crazy decisions like this. God help them.
7

sarahu,

Fairlight 01/07/2008 15:59:42
All the assurances about the future of these three schools, when all along ESCC had decided that they would close them anyway. Bringing in Sir Dexter and implementing his programme has cost a considerable amount of money, which will now be to no avail. Staff will lose interest due to lack of job permenance and a string of temps will probably end up in place.

For children due to start at secondary school over the next couple of years this is a huge blow, starting at a new school is always an anxious time and to know you will have to go through it again a year or two's time is not beneficial to children or parents. In the interim period this will put Helenswood & William Parker under even more pressure for admissions as parents will want continuity for their children and a proven track record.

Why close Filsham Valley when it is a modern building that only opened in the recent past? What another fabulous waste of money. But never mind ESCC will get it back by selling on all three sites for future development!
8

bart simpson,

01/07/2008 16:28:08
So much for consultation... what utter rubbish... and the Governors of all three schools were MISLED into these proposals.... talk about a three line whip....Why were the Governors only given partial facts, and not the full picture??
9

A worried teacher,

Hastings 03/07/2008 22:10:11
I am a teacher at one of these schools involved and have found myself becoming more confused and worried about what will actually happen to me and my colleagues. We are being told to be enthusiastic about the changes but I feel very unsupported in the decision-making process. We have not been given enough information to make informed decisions and are expected to be motivated and happy about this 'opportunity'. Perhaps those who feel they know and understand education (because they once went to school!) should come and try it out. I am sick of people telling me how I should do my job; that I should be motivated and enthusiastic about such changes; that I am somehow failing students in gaining a 'decent' education (when our hands are so tied to curriculum we have to follow rather than being able to write our own that suit our students' needs). PLEASE don't tell me how to do my job or tell me how I should feel until YOU have walked a day in my shoes! Teachers have friends in places where information is available and we know that much is being 'witheld' which is adding to our frustration and worry. Please can those who hold the information be more open and share it - we are, after all, adults and able to cope with the truth. Negative comments such as those made in the original piece above have done nothing to improve our image, in fact, given the number of people who will read it, will only add to their existing negativity toward us.
10

Tallinnska,

04/07/2008 13:53:17
"Failing" is a pejorative adjective used by the media to describe schools. It is NOT used by the DCSF to describe any of the schools in the list of 638 National Challenge schools because the DCSF recognise that there's a lot of hard work being done in the schools on the challenge list, and the DCSF also recognises that there are often significant socio-economic barriers which also need to be addressed beyond the school gates. I don't see any flavour of that in either the front page article, or the editor's view.
I whole heartedly agree with some previous posts that it might be an idea for some people who think they know all about teaching & dealing with teenagers on a daily basis to actually think about whether they really think they would have the patience and skills to work day in, day out with 21st century teenagers......the students, teachers and staff at the three schools deserve better treatment than they're receiving from this 'news'paper.
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.