Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Just Property Estate Agents
Sponsored by
Just call us now for a free market appraisal
 
 
Sunday, 18th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

The Labour view



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 March 2008
I have no doubt in my mind that one of the most successful policies of our Labour Government in the past 10 years is the "Surestart" programme.
The objective was to give just that, a sure start to the under fives in an environment that would support not just the children but their parents too.

The first scheme which started on the Broomgrove Estate in Hastings, developed from a play group in Halton run by Jan and was a great success. From the very beginning parents (particularly mothers) felt "at home". The idea of Surestart was to provide rather more than a nursery. It's purpose was to provide an environment which in which the children, their parents and carers could join in the learning experience.

Of course the children were the focus but soon projects such as the Horizons Learning Project for the parents was on board. Health visitors and other agencies came on site and for many this one stop supportive environment was simply " life changing ".

So successful was it that over the years the scheme has been broadened out so as that now we have nine centres with a tenth to be opened soon. Now named Surestart Children's Centres they have moved to Local Authority control but still funded by Government and they are in my view the jewel in the crown of Labour achievement.

One of the important aspects is the visiting service. Not everyone still feels comfortable about turning up at least initially and meeting people they do not know. Sometimes those who do attend need support in the home and the outreach workers from the Surestart Children Centres fill that role.

That is why I am so sad that something that has generally been supported by the other parties now appears to be an issue of conflict.

At last week's Conservative Party Spring conference the Tory leader David Cameron proposed that these outreach workers would be the first cuts in the Surestart programme. Happily despite the opinion polls I do not foresee David Cameron at No. 10 and able to fulfil the cuts programme he proposes but if it happened it would be disastrous.

The Surestart children's programme is about investment in our youngsters and therefore in all our futures. To cut the programme in any way would suggest knowing the cost but not the value of this precious project.

The full article contains 398 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 March 2008 8:05 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Hastings
 
Prev
1
2 3 4
1

Darryl,

Hastings 20/03/2008 08:41:35
POST OFFICE CUTS

Despite campaigning locally and availing himself of some good photo opportunities to save the local Post Offices , Michael Foster voted for continuation of POst Office Closures. There were some 20 Labour MP's who chose to oppose these and represent their constituent's wishes.

Yet David Cameron and the Conservatives chose to oppose further closures. So isn't Michaels critisim
of David Cameron above ..a case of "Those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. "
2

John Storm,

clive vale 20/03/2008 08:57:03
Michael 'my political career before my constituents'Foster nails his colours to his masters mast in the hope of a promotion in his corrupt Government whilst pensioners in clive Vale have seen the Mount Road and Harold Road Post Offices closed in the last 2 years and now have to walk to Ore or George Street, although George Street is soon to closed. Mr Foster the public do not forget and you will not be our represenatative after the next election because you do not represent out views, you meekly follow your leaders when you could fight for what people need. People before pounds!!!!
3

Darryl,

Hastings 20/03/2008 08:59:29
If cuts have to be made due to New Labour's administrative and fiscal negligence re the NHS , I would prefer cuts to outreach staff rather than in terms of Maternity and Accident and Emergency which Labour have on the agenda.
Remember option 4 and 5 ?
4

Googling,

20/03/2008 09:54:29
come on. no one was seriously taken in by the tories motion yesterday were they? its nothing more than a bit of opportunistic politics

The motion called for ceasing the closure of post offices yet tory policy means no subsidy would be paid. How then would they remain open? magic?

Labour give £150million/yr on top of 2billion and 1.7billion comitted. obviously that is not enough to maintain the network since the Post office are pushing on with closures. how then would this tory proposal work

its exploitative and offensive to local residents in my view.

labour should be working harder to help boost business and diversify post offices but that doesn't mean using vast amounts of money to keep open a business with no customers
5

Darryl,

Hastings 20/03/2008 11:25:21
The parliamentary motion put forward by the Conservatives yesterday re delaying Post Office Closures was a formal motion , and to suggest it wasn't is disingenuous. It was also supported by the Liberal Democrats. The whole object of the motion being to allow time to look at other possibilities as a key to keeping essential services open. If there were no customers as Googling is suggesting , there would not have been a public outcry in the first place !

It was interesting to read in the press this morning :

" The hunt will now be on for those Labour MP's who have pretended to support their local post office and then have done a runner when they had a chance to make a real difference."

Now thats what is exploitive of and offensive to local residents !
6

bart simpson,

20/03/2008 15:51:42
Regarding the Sure Start scheme... I prefer David Cameron's version and the testimonies of those qualified in working with children and families. Theyre version is not the same one that Mr Foster espouses...... The experts, and carers want the best care for their children and that is...... to axe the Sure start funding..... Instead of using highly paid Marxist cronies, Mr Cameron feels that it would be best to employ Qualified health visiors and health care professionals.... After all every child matters!

7

Googling,

20/03/2008 15:56:03
sorry darryl thats not right

if the tory motion had received a majority it would have in no way delayed post office closures. It is merely an expression of opinion and has no statutory outcome.

as i said before the tories were simply playing politics with peoples emotions

they say they want to keep post offices open but won't put any money in at all. this was an attempt to gain public favor without actually having to do anything

if labour and liberal MPs voted to support the motion they would have been helping the Tories not local post offices
8

O.M Riley,

20/03/2008 16:02:18
Qualified.. Nursery nurses were very highly skilled practioners too. The training lasted 4 years and there were continual assessments and examinations to ensure that staff were delivering the best possible care...

The good thing about training and using qualified health visitors is that in addition to being trained and skilled, because of the stringent regulations required the staff would have to continue to participate in professional development training. Thus up dating their skills and promoting safe practice.

Think this would be beneficial for all concerned.
Also in terms of recruiting staff it would be fairer as less likelihood of new labour cronies recruiting their chums..... Some good training courses available for any one worried about the loss of the niche packages which they have carved out for themselves- at Sure start.
9

Darryl,

Hasatings 20/03/2008 19:32:08
Googling...I understand and agree with what you're saying re statutory outcome. However had the government lost the vote they would have had to delay the programme. That is the whole part of having a parliament.

I quess though I can see your reasoning as this government has show the contempt it has for parliamentary conventions and wouldn't feel itself so bound.

Its a matter of opinion on the Tories rationale for the motion, so best to agree to disagree.

However regarding those Labour MP's who stated that they supported their local post offices and then voted the other way ...to my mind is a clear example of "playing with peoples' emotions" as you put it.

10

Darryl,

Hastings 20/03/2008 19:34:19
Good constructive points re Surestart by Bart and OM Riley. Lets hope someone takes notice !
Prev
1
2 3 4

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think the Jerwood Gallery will be good for Hastings?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.